Dzul g's Without Prejudice
Nato expands into crusades and inquisitions
World Futures Online
Islamic Politics
Nato expands into crusades and inquisitions | Nato expands into crusades and inquisitions |
|
|
|
| Written by Dzul G. | |
| Monday, 25 August 2008 | |
|
The US announced that Georgia’s membership to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Nato) will be speeded up while on the other hand, the Atlantic based organization is highly active in Afghanistan. Both Georgia and Afghanistan are geographical areas that are way out of the Atlantic Ocean and this raises the question of what are the aims of the Nato in the new world? ![]() Nato with its Cross as logo
Nato is being used in the war on terror, which has since 911 become a new crusade headed by Washington against Islam and Muslims. The terror war is being lost because it had no definitive rules and violated all the conventions. The US dragged the Nato into this fallacy not by accident but with a serious aim in view: The extension of the crusade and the start of a new inquisition. In January this year, the Nato rejected the swift inclusion of Georgia as one of its newest members. The opposition from European nations forced US President Bush to abandon the project. This left the Georgians hanging in the middle of the air, without being a Nato member it could not challenge Russia in Ossetia and Abkhazia – two breakaway republics in Georgia. Nevertheless, Tbilisi went ahead with its treats of disrupting the established peace in the two republics which are protected by Russia. It attacked Ossetia but was quickly routed from the territory. The aim of the attack is now more clearly understood. It was to impress the Europeans that Russia is a dangerous neighbor and that Georgia should become a Nato member immediately. In the event Bush had his ways in January and forced the EU to admit Georgia and Ukraine as Nato members, the recent Russian invasion would have committed NATO to go to war with Russia – which, despite its weakened state, still has a sizable army and thousands of nuclear missiles – to defend Georgia. Would Russia have retaliated against Georgia’s invasion of Ossetia had Georgia been a member of the Nato? The fact is Russia would have consolidated its positions in Ossetia and Abkhazia had Georgia become a member of the Nato. The two break-away states would have declared their unilateral independence by then and Russia would have committed its military to ensure their security against Georgia and Nato. Any Georgian attack against the two states would have meant Nato going to war against Russia, something which the Nato or the US is not willing to commit, not yet. In order to prevent the new inquisitors sitting in Nato to question Russia’s role and faith in the new world order, Moscow has to speed up the recognition of the two break-away states as independent republics and press for their recognition in the UN. In the event the UN – where the new inquisitors are still strong – Moscow will have to commit to defend Ossetia and Abkhazia militarily, which would keep both Georgia and Nato away for the time being. On the other hand, it is incredible that the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) has closed its eyes on the involvement of the Nato in Afghanistan. The organization has killed and is still killing innocent people in Afghan war it is carrying out in the name of freedom. The Muslim world is looking at the scene, impotent and speechless. This will only encourage the Nato to carry out its new defined role of crusader. The most recent US-led but Nato assisted attack in Afghanistan ended with the death of 95 people, a majority of them being women and children. The attack, which included air strikes, took place in the Shindand district of Herat province in the west of Afghanistan. Ninety five people, all civilians and most of them women and children, were martyred during the operation by coalition forces,". The coalition forces are the Nato working together with US forces on the grounds in Afghanistan. The US forms part of the Nato but it has its own military command in Afghanistan which decides on military operations carried out by the Nato. Most of the forces operating in Afghanistan are composed of non-Muslim soldiers who have no interest in protecting Muslims since their aim in joining the war with Nato is to kill Muslim terrorists. For them everyone is a terrorist hence the frequent if not regular killing of civilians by the Nato forces. ![]() The Inquision cross of Spanish days Some sources say the killing of the Afghan civilians came after the death of 10 French soldiers at the hands of the Taliban in an ambush near Kabul on Monday last. Nine more foreign soldiers has died since and the toll is rising. The killing of the civilians is thus seen as revenge killings by the Nato. The OIC and the Arab League and all the Muslim leaders are silent while the murderous campaign of the Nato crusaders against civilians continues! Georgia and Afghanistan are two different geographical locations on the map and they are not the priority of the Nato, which is an Atlantic based organization. The question is if they were not carrying out the mission of crusade against Muslims and inquest against Russia, then what are they doing in these two corners of the world far away from their original goals? Is this the new world order that the West is preparing for the rest of the world? Russia is being put to test by the Western world with its missile shield now a signed and done deal with Poland and its support for Georgia to attack two break-away republics when a peace keeping force is already there and the force being composed of Russian soldiers. The US, leader of the West, is now trying to speed up the Nato membership of Ukraine, a larger much stronger nation than Georgia but where the Russians has their historic Navy port of Sevastopol. The port also guarantees Russia’s security in the Black Sea. Ukraine is now demanding Russia’s withdrawal from Sevastopol, which is a port populated by Russians who are now Ukrainian citizens. In the recent years, the citizens of the port has even floated Russian flags to show their allegiance to Russia, not to Ukraine and this will raise major issues if Ukraine would insist on the removal of Russia’s military fleet – which would be replaced by Nato’s – from Sevastopol. While it is clear that Russia will not allow itself to be surrounded by a Nato alliance founded to contain Moscow, it is not clear what the Nato command will do regarding Afghanistan and the resurgent Taliban. Will it continue to kill civilians in response to the Taliban’s attack on its troops? Will it continue to murder and tell the world that it is defending the war on terror? It also clear that the Americans has failed to realize that Russia is a indeed a stronger nation than it thought and that its intelligence were wrong on the way Russia will respond – at the height of the Olympic games in Beijing – to a Georgian invasion of Ossetia. Now that this is settled and that the return of Russia on the international scene is confirmed, it is hoped that the US and the Nato will go back to their drawing boards and re-define their aims. As much as a cold war will not be welcomed in the world today, an inquisition ala-Spanish conducted by the Nato with the US at the religious altar will fail. The same way the war on terror which is being fought by Nato forces in Afghanistan has failed! The concerns of the free world however remain with the US easily falling into the hands of religious fanatics like George W. Bush and the Nato being dragged to carry out the ‘crusades’ of the US what is next on the plate for countries like Iran, China, India and Russia if they refuse to submit to the crusaders and the inquisitors? This also raises the question of the relevance of the Nato and why the US is very busy consolidating this redundant organization that has been given a new justification. While Moscow shed away its past by disbanding the Warsaw Pact of nations, the US and the EU maintained the Nato – a product of the cold war – and is now using it to threaten the rest of the world with its military might. Should the world ask for the disbandment of the Nato and let the world grow on its own? Most of the opinions in the US in particular are for the survival of the Nato and this includes both John Mc Cain the Republican candidate and Barack Obama the Democratic candidate in the upcoming US presidential. Both candidates believe the Nato must be reinforced with the membership of Georgia and Ukraine with the aim of containing Russia. Both candidates also want the Nato to fight the remnants of the war on terror which was born from the 911 events and which is a war the US wanted the whole world to fight on its behalf. The new Nato is no good news for the rest of the world that does not want to become slaves to the US and the EU once again! Comments (0)
Write comment
|
|
| Last Updated ( Monday, 25 August 2008 ) |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
A gold mania could happen.
Here's why... Gold manias begin when investors flee real estate, currencies, bonds, and stocks because their prospects are so bleak. We're close to that right now.
For more information and guidelines on how to write for World Futures, please send an email to our editor at the following address:
Immediate topics of interest:
1. Israel and Palestine peace deal and the Obama campaign
2. The US and its diplomatic efforts towards Iran’s nuclear programme
3. The Asean and Human rights
Obama will lose Muslim supporters
Name: Asir Husain Kazi
Age: 11
School: SKTK - Ampang
Another example of American criminality
LAHORE, Pakistan — When Muhammad Saad Iqbal arrived home here in August after more than six years in American custody, including five at the military prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, he had difficulty walking, his left ear was severely infected, and he was dependent on a cocktail of antibiotics and antidepressants.
By Steve Doughty
Last updated at 12:09 AM on 25th October 2008
Islamic courts have been cleared to deal with family and divorce disputes.
We publish this opinion article from the Monday Morning newspaper published in Beirut, Lebanon. Article is written by Gwynne Dyer.
Wed, 12/31/2008 10:50 AM | Reader's Forum - The Jakarta Post
I would like to comment on the article titled "Religious freedom, tolerance in jeopardy", (The Jakarta Post, Dec. 24).
| More NEWS items here
Holocaust Lies and Romance Stop NATO Usenet Nato dilemma deepens CIA death squads US failure in Ossetia Who Is Section |
Mahathir urges boycott of US goods
-
PRLog-Free PressRelease Service------------------------
NATO as a global army? We tell you more!
- |
|