Neo-Cons and Hypocrytes want to undermine Islam

 

What is the fundamental principles of the arguments put forward by the IFC's and ultras? This is a question that not many people have asked. There is the sense of knowledge in the minds of the people that the IFC and its supporters are simply trying to undermine Islam. However, the arguments they are putting forward and the tactics they are using will have severe bearing on the Muslims in the short and in the long run.

First and foremost, the IFC rely on what it calls the democratic principle of freedom of speech and freedom of choice. It also applies rules of what it says are embedded in the United Nations (UN) charter on Human Rights. By applying these rules, it want fair play and it want discussions on a 'matured' level and one in which the Muslims will have to accept their views and possibly abide to their views.

From the beginning itself they do not believe that God or Allah is of essence in such discussions. They believe that they should impose their views while the Muslims must accept their views and they will not accept Islam's views and rights. They have rights, the Muslims have no rights, they have views and the Muslims must become the puppet while the masters of the IFC pulls the strings and forces the Muslims to take their rules, their views and their decisions as final.

Is this the way for a 'democratic' respect of people's rights?

In some Universities in Malaysia, lecturers of non-Muslim faith has been giving the bible to targeted Muslim students. They will study the character of the student and when they find flaws in the understanding of Islam, they invite these students to read the bible or to listen to discourses on the bible.

Where are the Muslim responsible parties who are supposed to ensure that Muslims does not fall into such traps? Do they believe that Muslims should read all the religious books and decide for themselves which is the faith they would follow? Is that the norm in the future Malaysia?

There is a simple logic to understand why Islam does not allow Muslims to be apostates. The fact that Islam was created at all is part of the simplicity of the reasoning here. It was created to prevent the victory of the devil over mankind and to prepare the human race for salvation. The little devils who are pressing the Muslims to adopt laws that will allow apostasy are part of this devilish plan to undermine mankind and to prevent the salvation of man from the grasp of the devil itself.

The promoters of the new deal in which Islam has to abandon its centuries old principle of prevention against apostasy are definitely pushing the agenda that, if adopted, will end up destroying Muslim communities across the world. The agenda of the promoters of apostasy under the guise of freedom of choice of religion is simplistic altogether. They are not proposing anything better than Islam yet they are asking the Muslims to allow their children or brethren and sisters to renounce a system made to perfection for the unknown or a form of addition to a culture that will eventually deny mankind its salvation.

In Malaysia, Islam should be used to prevent people who follows the faith from immersing themselves in illicit activities. These activities are alcohol and drugs addictions, stealing, robberies and cheating. Eating non-Halal food and doing business that borders in the haram, including corruption, nepotism and partisanship. Also included in the list of illicit activities – and which Islam as well conventional knowledge agrees upon – will be womanizing and man eating habits for women, homosexuality and lesbianism (which is on the rise) and fornication or adulterous habits.

To see the hidden agenda of the IFC type of organizations, which is the capturing of Malaysia from Muslim hands, one must listen carefully to what they are saying and what they are proposing. The fundamental question is what are the promoters of apostasy offering the Muslims in return for abandoning Islam, which by all leagues is the perfect barometer to prevent all the sins and illicit activities mentioned above.

The UN charters of human rights, of freedom of expression and freedom of choice does not label as illicit these activities. Its charters does not prepare the people from staying away from these illicit activities. The UN has no credible way of stopping the rot in any society. Islam has this capacity and Islam is a powerful tool that can prevent a degeneration of societies as well as the downtrodden of mankind into the doldrums of anarchy.

The failures of the UN to prevent the massacre of Muslims in Srebenica, Yugoslavia is a crude example of the savagery the Muslims are to expect from emotionally charged non-Muslims. The same UN did not prevent the conflict in Lebanon. The UN is a failed institution that is now being used by the anti-Muslim neo-cons of the US to push the finality of their agendas: The destruction of what they regard as the most powerful system on earth – Islam.

Thus following the principles laid by the UN is not the correct example the IFC and its supporters – which include groups like the Sisters of Islam (SIS) – are proposing. The UN has been a lamentable force when it comes to the respect of basic human rights in Malaysia. The same organizations that supports the UN's charters has not pressed for the freedom of the press or the freedom of expression in Malaysia. Then why the sudden attack on Islam and the challenge to Muslims to change or to face what? UN sanctions?

Why did the UN not sanction Putrajaya for not signing the UN charter on Human Rights, Press freedom and freedom of expression? Then why now charging against us Muslims to adopt the charters of evil that is now being used by the IFC and its supporters to swallow Malaysia away from the grip of the Muslims.

As a matter of fact, the current attacks on Islam and the Muslims from groups like the IFC and its associates represent the second phase of the new world war commonly called the war on terrorism. We all know that the terrorism exists in all forms and involves all kind of people, cultures and countries. The white men are the greatest terrorists on record in contemporary history after what they have done to Iraq and after their destroying of the wild life in most parts of the world. They are also the ones responsible for the green house effect across the world, but as usual, they are blaming the third and second world for these troubles.

Representatives of the white men on earth have massacred and at times eliminate various peoples from the surface of the earth, in the America's, in Africa and even in Europe or Asia. They have a history of destruction and massacres that is still their moto for survival. Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Palestine just to name a few are the current victims of this form of cultural and political terrorism that the world is witnessing. Compare this to the so called terrorism of the non-existent Al-Qaeda and one gets a storm in a tea cup stirred by Osama Bin Laden while George W. Bush and his acolytes have killed more people than Saddam Hussein or Mussab Al Zarqawi!

Terrorism is being used by the anti-Muslim groups under the banner of Interfaith organizations world wide to spread anti-Islamic messages and to undermine countries like Malaysia. They want the Malaysian nation to stumble and fall culturally so that it will be an easy prey to be conquered by the neo-cons from Washington.

The Holy Al Quraan does indeed mention the fate of apostates and how to handle those who attempt to leave Islam. However, the apostates, the promoters of apostasy and those in the groups called the munafiqs and mushriqs (hypocrites and those who associates other entities with the Creator) refuses to accept such facts.

The Prophet of Islam, Peace Be Upon Him has also given the guidance on how to deal with apostates however, to push their agenda towards successful implementation and to bend the Malaysian government for example, the promoters of apostasy (in pure heresy) argues that the Hadiths or traditions of the prophet are not valid and are not to be used in any decisions on the future of apostasy in Malaysia.

They also argue that some groups of Muslims does not follow the traditions of the prophet of Islam on the grounds that there is no real need to abide to what the prophet said and did. Ignoring the prophet make it easier for the hypocrites to accept apostasy. Will this make it easier also for the authorities in Malaysia and the Supreme Court of the country – pressed by the Bar Council of Malaysia – to allow Muslims to leave Islam and join other faiths?

Ignoring the decisions and sayings of the prophet is easy for those who want a corrupt system and wishes to use Islam for their own advantages and at the cost of others. This is purely the hijacking of Islamic principles for the purpose of undermining the Muslims. The principle of accepting Islam as the basis of livelihood should be taken as a complete package, not into bits and pieces that satisfies the human needs for today but ignores the same needs in another situation.

Comments (2)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Show/Hide comments

this is South East Asia...Arabists get l
written by The Watcher, December 27, 2006

If I were you, I\'d scurry like the little rat you are back into your Islamofascist sewer.

Every anti-terrorism task force on this planet will be hunting you down.

If you\'re in Malaysia, I\'m sure the Special Branch will be paying you a visit soon.

Cheerio.

To The Watcher
written by Kazi, December 28, 2006

Thanks for your advice yet we do not need to fear you or fear special branch in Malaysia.

Malaysia is a free country that is why you joker can still post such messages here! Don\'t you get it?
You must adapt to the knowledge that Muslims are here to stay and will defend Islam whatever you say!

Yours

PS: U should probably be weary of some extremist muslims who might be looking for u in Malaysia...we here do not bother about u!

Name

Email

Website

Title

Comment

Write the displayed characters

Add Comment